My photo at home
A Lot of Joy from God!

Oleksandr Zhabenko

šŸ‡¬šŸ‡§ Glory be to Jesus Christ! šŸŒž

Dedicated to Emma Kok.

(1 Corinthians XVI, 4-12)

1 Corinthians XVI, 4 – ā€˜ĪµĪ¼ĪæĪ¹ā€™ – ā€˜emoi’ - (with) ā€˜me’.

1 Corinthians XVI, 12 – ā€˜ĪµĻ…ĪŗĪ±Ī¹ĻĪ·ĻƒĪ·ā€™ – ā€˜eukairese’ – ā€˜will have a good opportunity, a good time, leisure time’.

In general, the reading is about the plans of Paul and his close co-workers to visit the Corinthians. From the point of view of faith, it is an instructive text that it is reasonable to take into account various circumstances, including time and occasion.

(Matthew XXI, 28-32)

The parable of the two sons. The sons refer to different people who have two different attitudes to God’s will, the will of the Father.

The question Who fulfilled it? refers to the final result, since it was the decisive one. In the parable, the sons’ agreement/disagreement is connected with the so-called self-identification of a person – how a person relates to God and how important this is to him or her. Consent means that a person considers themselves to be a believer and a devout person, to a certain extent it matters to them, they perceive themselves as such. Disagreement, on the contrary, means that a person does not want to associate themselves with God, at least at some stage of their life, i.e.Ā they are moving away from God and towards sin or directly into sin.

Instead, here we see the importance of repentance. Many sinful people who had fallen away from God and did not consider themselves righteous and devout were converted by John the Baptist’s preaching of repentance, but those who considered themselves devout and righteous did not want to do so, because their own self-esteem prevented them from doing so. Instead, they received a second call to repentance through seeing the conversion of obviously sinful people, but they did not want to do that themselves because they did not want to see their own sins. And so, in the end, what would move them to repentance? And if it is God’s will that they repent, because everyone is a sinner, then they did not fulfil God’s will.

I would like to point out that the parable does not imply that it is better to be a sinful person first in order to be saved. Yes, in the parable, sinful people repented. But this required the sermon of John the Baptist (a unique case in history, but more generally, it required a significant impetus to repentance). What if a person does not feel such a push? What if sin blocks their vision altogether? Then his condition is even worse than that of the one who agreed but did not go.

That is why the parable teaches repentance first and foremost, teaches us to be open to conversion and repentance (not to look for any special nudges), and also humility – a true vision of our condition and readiness to correct it. In this way, the parable is similar to another place in the Gospel, which was discussed here:
24072023.html

To the Great Martyr and Healer Panteleimon:
(2 Timothy II, 1-10; John XV, 17 – XVI, 2)
For the readings from the Apostle to the Great Martyrs, see the link (there, in relation to Theodore Stratilat):
21062023.html

For the readings from the Gospel, see here:
06052023.html

Glory be to Thee, our God, glory be to Thee!

Source:
https://www.facebook.com/Oleksandr.S.Zhabenko/

List of Used Sources